- Level Up Coding
- LUC #30: Understanding Database Types — Relational, Vector, Graph, and More
LUC #30: Understanding Database Types — Relational, Vector, Graph, and More
Plus, Monolithic vs Microservices Architecture, the differences between HTTP and HTTPS, and how quantum computing works
This week’s issue brings you:
READ TIME: 8 MINUTES
Understanding Database Types — Relational, Vector, Graph, and More
The performance of a software application often relies on choosing the correct database(s). As software developers, we encounter a wide range of database choices. Recognizing the distinctions among these choices and selecting those that most closely match the needs of our project is essential. Typically, a complex application employs multiple databases, each tailored to meet a particular need of the application. Let’s delve into the world of database types and explore where each one fits best.
Being at the heart of traditional data storage, relational databases organize data into structured tables, with rows representing records and columns storing corresponding data fields. These setups, enhanced by the use of SQL, excel in managing and querying structured information, making them ideal for tasks requiring precise data organization, like customer records or inventory tracking.
Relational databases are particularly effective when ACID compliance is required, and where predefined schemas can be established. However, their structured approach, while beneficial for specific tasks, presents limitations in handling unstructured data, posing challenges in environments with evolving data needs.
Columnar databases, in contrast to traditional row-based relational databases, store data in columns rather than rows. This architectural design significantly boosts their performance for analytical processing, where complex queries across large datasets, particularly involving aggregate functions, are common.
These databases excel in environments requiring rapid and frequent access to specific data columns, such as in customer analytics or financial data analysis. The column-based structure enhances data retrieval and aggregation speeds, making columnar databases highly effective for handling and analyzing extensive datasets. Columnar databases can be an ideal choice for big data analytics, and business intelligence applications.
However, their focus on column-based storage and retrieval may not be as efficient for transactional systems, where data is typically written in small, regular transactions. This specialization can limit their suitability in scenarios that require a balanced approach to both data handling and transactional processing.
When it comes to handling unstructured data, document databases reign supreme with their ability to store data in semi-structured formats like JSON or XML. This method offers exceptional flexibility in data management, making these databases a top choice for environments with complex or continually changing data structures, such as content management systems and e-commerce platforms.
Their schema-less approach facilitates rapid development and iteration, enabling them to adapt seamlessly to evolving data requirements. Yet, this same flexibility can sometimes complicate ensuring data consistency and integrity, particularly in large-scale or complex systems where maintaining structured data relationships is crucial.
Key-value databases represent a straightforward form of database, where data is handled using a unique key for each value. This simplicity makes them highly efficient for operations involving inserting, updating, and retrieving data. Often utilized for smaller datasets, key-value Databases are particularly popular for temporary purposes like caching or session management, where speed and simplicity are paramount.
Their uncomplicated structure is great for rapid access and modification of data, streamlining processes where quick data retrieval is crucial. But this simplicity also means key-value databases might not be the best fit for complex data handling or scenarios requiring detailed data relationships.
Graph databases take a unique approach to data management, emphasizing the storage and querying of highly connected data. In these databases, records are represented as nodes and relationships as edges, utilizing graph theory to efficiently traverse connections between nodes. This design makes them exceptionally well suited for applications involving complex relationships, such as social networks, recommendation engines and fraud detection systems, where navigating intricate data connections is key.
One of the key strengths of graph databases is their ability to reveal insights from the relationships and interconnections within data. One of the main downfalls is that they can be over-engineered for simpler, less connected datasets. In situations where data relationships are straightforward or minimal, the advanced capabilities of graph databases might not be fully utilized, potentially leading to unnecessary complexity in the data management process.
Time-series databases are the go-to choice for managing sequential, time-stamped data, vital in fields like IoT and monitoring systems. With built-in time-based functions, they are adept at storing, querying, and analyzing large datasets over time, making them a great fit for applications requiring trend analysis, forecasting, and real-time insights.
This specialized design is exceptionally capable in capturing and analyzing changes over time, a crucial feature for environments where understanding temporal dynamics is important. These specializations make time-series databases highly effective for sequential, time-stamped data, but limited for most other purposes. Time-series databases may struggle in scenarios that require handling diverse data types or general-purpose data storage, as they are optimized primarily for time-focused data management.
Vector Databases are designed for complex searches and AI-driven applications, utilizing a vector space model to handle high-dimensional data, complex queries and pattern recognition. Their main strength lies in supporting AI and machine learning, offering deep insights and relevant search results, ideal for recommendation systems and complex search functionalities.
If you’re working on machine learning projects, you might find vector databases to be a top consideration. Yet, the same architecture behind these databases that makes them great in AI and ML-based applications also makes them less suitable for basic data management tasks. The complexity and specialized knowledge required for Vector Databases can be excessive for straightforward storage or retrieval needs, and the vector space model generally makes it a poor fit for data relationships that are not vector-based.
A Database for Every Need
Each database type has its specialty: Relational for structured data and ACID compliance, Columnar for analytics, Document for unstructured data flexibility, Graph for complex relationships, Time-Series for time-stamped data, Vector for AI and ML scenarios, and Key-value for simple, fast data access.
Using the right database type can be a game changer for performance, the wrong one can wreak havoc. The right choice depends on the project's specific needs. Understanding these differences enables teams to pick the right database(s) for their application or system, a key decision for ensuring efficient data management, scalability, and overall system reliability and performance.
Monolithic vs Microservices (Recap)
Monolithic is a software design pattern where all application components are combined into a single, tightly-coupled, unified application.
Whereas in a microservices design, components of an application are structured as a collection of loosely coupled, independently deployable services. Each service corresponds to a specific business functionality.
Microservices have been very popular as of late, but that doesn’t mean every application should be moved into a microservices architecture. Whilst there are significant benefits, there are also significant drawbacks. Which is best depends on the requirements of the system, the context of the team, and the business’s goals.
HTTP vs HTTPS (Recap)
HTTP → Hypertext Transfer Protocol.
HTTPS → Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure.
The primary difference between these two protocols is security.
HTTP is not secure. Data exchanged between your browser & the site you're visiting is in plain text (unencrypted). If someone intercepts this transmission, they can read and manipulate the data.
HTTPS is a secure protocol. Information transferred is encrypted using TLS (Transport Layer Security) or SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) protocols, providing privacy and integrity of information.
How Does Quantum Computing Work? (Recap)
Quantum computers can perform multiple calculations simultaneously, which gives them much more processing power than classical computers. Two of the primary principles responsible for the ability to process multiple possibilities concurrently are superposition and entanglement.
Unlike classical computing, which operates on a binary system of 1s and 0s, a quantum bit (qubit) can exist in multiple states at the same time; this is called ‘superposition’.
Entanglement suggests that two qubits can be intrinsically linked, meaning the state of one qubit is directly related to the state of another.
Superposition and entanglement allow quantum computers to process information in a very different way from classical computers. Qubits can handle information that is far denser than the classical binary approach. Entanglement helps make computation shortcuts leading to algorithms that are far more efficient and powerful.
That wraps up this week’s issue of Level Up Coding’s newsletter!
Join us again next week where we’ll explore what is Kafka and how it works, binary trees, SSL vs TLS, and caching.